<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tools of the Trades</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theunpluggedwoodshop.com/tools-of-the-trades.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theunpluggedwoodshop.com/tools-of-the-trades.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:50:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Fidgen</title>
		<link>http://www.theunpluggedwoodshop.com/tools-of-the-trades.html#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Fidgen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 14:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theunpluggedwoodshop.com/tools-of-the-trades.html#comment-265</guid>
		<description>Hey Chris,

thanks for the comment and the great info on how to detect if the iron is made up of  laminated steel. I&#039;d probably use an original iron if I had one in decent shape- most are too thin for my taste and I&#039;ve found they&#039;ll only hold a decent edge for 20 minutes of work at best- then it&#039;s back to the sharpening bench...modern irons like the Hock or LN or Veritas keep an edge almost twice as long as the older ones I have. That said, some of my old planes still have original irons and the transitional is still one of them. Turned out the Hock iron I was planing on using wouldn&#039;t seat into the blade adjustment peg on this model plane. I kept the original iron and sharpened it up a few times now. I don&#039;t use it very often due to the wide mouth but still plan on giving it an over-haul one day.
keep well and thanks again for the tip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Chris,</p>
<p>thanks for the comment and the great info on how to detect if the iron is made up of  laminated steel. I&#8217;d probably use an original iron if I had one in decent shape- most are too thin for my taste and I&#8217;ve found they&#8217;ll only hold a decent edge for 20 minutes of work at best- then it&#8217;s back to the sharpening bench&#8230;modern irons like the Hock or LN or Veritas keep an edge almost twice as long as the older ones I have. That said, some of my old planes still have original irons and the transitional is still one of them. Turned out the Hock iron I was planing on using wouldn&#8217;t seat into the blade adjustment peg on this model plane. I kept the original iron and sharpened it up a few times now. I don&#8217;t use it very often due to the wide mouth but still plan on giving it an over-haul one day.<br />
keep well and thanks again for the tip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hudson</title>
		<link>http://www.theunpluggedwoodshop.com/tools-of-the-trades.html#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hudson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 07:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theunpluggedwoodshop.com/tools-of-the-trades.html#comment-264</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom,

Little late maybe (just found your site), but why not first give the original SW blade a shot? (I have Hocks, but they usually cost more than the Plane - so a number of mine still have the original blades). If you are taking light cuts as a smoother, may work just fine.

And a number of these SW blades from that period are actually laminated - a higher carbon steel on the edge side - lower carbon but  tougher on the back. After regrinding the main 25-degree bevel, look across it, and if you see a gray line - metal darker on one side, lighter on the other - you have one of Stanley&#039;s laminated &#039;composite&#039; blades.. Their &#039;best&#039; supposedly..

Let us know?

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom,</p>
<p>Little late maybe (just found your site), but why not first give the original SW blade a shot? (I have Hocks, but they usually cost more than the Plane &#8211; so a number of mine still have the original blades). If you are taking light cuts as a smoother, may work just fine.</p>
<p>And a number of these SW blades from that period are actually laminated &#8211; a higher carbon steel on the edge side &#8211; lower carbon but  tougher on the back. After regrinding the main 25-degree bevel, look across it, and if you see a gray line &#8211; metal darker on one side, lighter on the other &#8211; you have one of Stanley&#8217;s laminated &#8216;composite&#8217; blades.. Their &#8216;best&#8217; supposedly..</p>
<p>Let us know?</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Handi</title>
		<link>http://www.theunpluggedwoodshop.com/tools-of-the-trades.html#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>Handi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theunpluggedwoodshop.com/tools-of-the-trades.html#comment-263</guid>
		<description>Tom,

Thanks for the information.

if you have an email address i can get ahold of you at i&#039;ll send you a picture or two and let you take a gander at it and tell me what you think.

Handi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>Thanks for the information.</p>
<p>if you have an email address i can get ahold of you at i&#8217;ll send you a picture or two and let you take a gander at it and tell me what you think.</p>
<p>Handi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Fidgen</title>
		<link>http://www.theunpluggedwoodshop.com/tools-of-the-trades.html#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Fidgen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 02:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theunpluggedwoodshop.com/tools-of-the-trades.html#comment-262</guid>
		<description>Handi,
thanks for the comment.
If the entire sole is bad you may consider replacing it- this isn&#039;t an easy job but I&#039;ve seen it done before. You basically need to plane off the exsisting sole and replace it with a new strip of wood. The mouth on my transitional smoother is a little larger tahn I&#039;d like so I&#039;ve decided to chop out an area in front of the mouth and add a new hardwood plate. When I tackle it I&#039;ll post an article on the process. It&#039;s on my list!
keep well.
Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Handi,<br />
thanks for the comment.<br />
If the entire sole is bad you may consider replacing it- this isn&#8217;t an easy job but I&#8217;ve seen it done before. You basically need to plane off the exsisting sole and replace it with a new strip of wood. The mouth on my transitional smoother is a little larger tahn I&#8217;d like so I&#8217;ve decided to chop out an area in front of the mouth and add a new hardwood plate. When I tackle it I&#8217;ll post an article on the process. It&#8217;s on my list!<br />
keep well.<br />
Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Handi</title>
		<link>http://www.theunpluggedwoodshop.com/tools-of-the-trades.html#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Handi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theunpluggedwoodshop.com/tools-of-the-trades.html#comment-261</guid>
		<description>I purchases one similar off of eBay a few months back. Although the soul on mine wasn&#039;t that great of condition. 

If you have any ideas on resurfacing the soul I&#039;d very much love to hear it. 

Handi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purchases one similar off of eBay a few months back. Although the soul on mine wasn&#8217;t that great of condition. </p>
<p>If you have any ideas on resurfacing the soul I&#8217;d very much love to hear it. </p>
<p>Handi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

